If people need motivation to get up from their office chairs or couches and become less sedentary, two useful new studies could provide the impetus. One found that sitting less can slow the aging process within cells, and the other helpfully underscores that standing up — even if you are standing still — can be good for you as well.
如果人們需要一些動(dòng)力才愿意從辦公椅和沙發(fā)上站起來(lái)，少坐一會(huì)兒，那么兩項(xiàng)有用的新研究能提供這種動(dòng)力。其中一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，少坐能減緩細(xì)胞衰老速度；另一項(xiàng)研究強(qiáng)調(diào)站立——哪怕只是靜靜地站著——也對(duì)健康有益。
For most of us nowadays, sitting is our most common waking activity, with many of us sitting for eight hours or more every day. Even people who exercise for an hour or so tend to spend most of the remaining hours of the day in a chair.
靜坐是我們大部分人清醒時(shí)最常見(jiàn)的狀態(tài)，很多人每天坐八小時(shí)以上。甚至連那些每天鍛煉一小時(shí)左右的人其他大部分時(shí)間也都是坐著。
The health consequences of this sedentariness are well-documented. Past studies have found that the more hours that people spend sitting, the more likely they are to develop diabetes, heart disease and other conditions, and potentially to die prematurely — even if they exercise regularly.
久坐會(huì)帶來(lái)健康隱患，這一點(diǎn)證據(jù)確鑿。過(guò)去的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，人們坐的時(shí)間越長(zhǎng)，越有可能患上糖尿病和心臟病等疾病，甚至可能早死——即使進(jìn)行有規(guī)律地鍛煉。
But most of these studies were associational, meaning that they found a link between sitting and illness, but could not prove whether or how sitting actually causes ill health.
但是這些研究大多得出的是關(guān)聯(lián)性結(jié)論，也就是說(shuō)，它們發(fā)現(xiàn)久坐與患病有關(guān)，但是不能證明久坐是否的確或者如何導(dǎo)致健康問(wèn)題。
So for the most groundbreaking of the new studies, which was published this month in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, scientists in Sweden decided to mount an actual experiment, in which they would alter the amount of time that people spent exercising and sitting, and track certain physiological results. In particular, with this experiment, the scientists were interested in whether changes in sedentary time would affect people’s telomeres.
到目前為止，新研究中最具突破性的是本月在《英國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》(British Journal of Sports Medicine)上發(fā)表的研究——瑞典科學(xué)家們決定進(jìn)行一項(xiàng)實(shí)際實(shí)驗(yàn)，他們?cè)趯?shí)驗(yàn)中改變?nèi)藗冨憻捄挽o坐的時(shí)間長(zhǎng)度，然后追蹤某些生理后果�？茖W(xué)家們對(duì)這個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)最感興趣的是，這些改變是否會(huì)影響人們的染色體端粒。
If you are unfamiliar with the componentry of your genes, telomeres are the tiny caps on the ends of DNA strands. They shorten and fray as a cell ages, although the process is not strictly chronological. Obesity, illness and other conditions can accelerate the shortening, causing cells to age prematurely, while some evidence suggests that healthy lifestyles may preserve telomere length, delaying cell aging.
你可能對(duì)基因的組成部分不太了解，所以我簡(jiǎn)單介紹一下，染色體端粒是DNA鏈條末端的小帽子。隨著細(xì)胞老化，它們會(huì)縮短、磨損，不過(guò)這一過(guò)程不完全由時(shí)間決定。肥胖、疾病和其他健康問(wèn)題會(huì)加速端�？s短，導(dǎo)致細(xì)胞提前老化，而有些證據(jù)表明健康的生活方式能維持端粒長(zhǎng)度，延緩細(xì)胞衰老。
For the new experiment, the Swedish scientists recruited a group of sedentary, overweight men and women, all aged 68, and drew blood, in order to measure the length of telomeres in the volunteers’ white blood cells. Then half of the volunteers began an individualized, moderate exercise program, designed to improve their general health. They also were advised to sit less.
為了這個(gè)新實(shí)驗(yàn)，瑞典科學(xué)家招募了一群習(xí)慣久坐的68歲超重男女，采血測(cè)量他們白細(xì)胞中端粒的長(zhǎng)度。然后，其中一半志愿者開(kāi)始個(gè)性化的適度鍛煉計(jì)劃，旨在提高總體健康狀況。同時(shí)建議他們少坐。
The other volunteers were told to continue with their normal lives, although the scientists urged them to try to lose weight and be healthy, without offering any specific methods.
科學(xué)家們讓其他志愿者繼續(xù)像往常那樣生活，但是鼓勵(lì)他們盡量減肥，保持健康，不過(guò)沒(méi)有提供具體方法。
After six months, the volunteers all returned for a second blood draw and to complete questionnaires about their daily activities. These showed that those in the exercise group were, not surprisingly, exercising more than they had been previously. But they were also, for the most part, sitting substantially less than before.
六個(gè)月后，志愿者們第二次抽血，完成關(guān)于日�；顒�(dòng)的問(wèn)卷。結(jié)果表明，鍛煉組的人不出所料比從前鍛煉得更多。但是他們大部分人坐的時(shí)間也比從前少了很多。
And when the scientists compared telomeres, they found that the telomeres in the volunteers who were sitting the least had lengthened. Their cells seemed to be growing physiologically younger.
科學(xué)家們?cè)诒容^端粒時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)，坐得最少的志愿者的端粒延長(zhǎng)了。從生理上講，他們的細(xì)胞似乎更年輕了。
Meanwhile, in the control group telomeres generally were shorter than they had been six months before.
與此同時(shí)，控制組志愿者的端�？傮w來(lái)說(shuō)比六個(gè)月前更短了。
But perhaps most interesting, there was little correlation between exercise and telomere length. In fact, the volunteers in the exercise group who had worked out the most during the past six months tended now to have slightly less lengthening and even some shortening, compared to those who had exercised less but stood up more.
但是也許最有趣的是，鍛煉與端粒長(zhǎng)度之間幾乎沒(méi)有聯(lián)系。實(shí)際上，在鍛煉組中，在這六個(gè)月里鍛煉最多的人與鍛煉得不多但是站立時(shí)間更長(zhǎng)的人相比，端粒增長(zhǎng)得略微少一些，有些甚至縮短了。
Reducing sedentary time had lengthened telomeres, the scientists concluded, while exercising had played little role.
科學(xué)家們得出結(jié)論，減少靜坐時(shí)間延長(zhǎng)了端粒長(zhǎng)度，而鍛煉對(duì)此幾乎毫無(wú)作用。
Exactly what the volunteers did in lieu of sitting is impossible to say with precision, said Per Sjögren, a professor of public health at Uppsala University in Sweden, who led the study, because the researchers did not track their volunteers’ movement patterns with monitors. But “it’s most likely,” he said, that “sitting time was predominantly replaced with low-intensity activities,” and in particular with time spent standing up.
這項(xiàng)研究的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者、瑞典烏普薩拉大學(xué)的公共健康教授佩爾·肖格倫(Per Sjögren)說(shuō)，志愿者們用什么活動(dòng)來(lái)代替靜坐無(wú)從準(zhǔn)確得知，因?yàn)檠芯空邆儧](méi)用監(jiān)測(cè)器追蹤志愿者們的活動(dòng)模式。但是他說(shuō)，“最可能的情況是，靜坐時(shí)間主要是被低強(qiáng)度的活動(dòng)代替”，尤其是站立。
Which makes the second new study of sedentary behavior particularly relevant. Standing is not, after all, physically demanding for most people, and some scientists have questioned whether merely standing up — without also moving about and walking — is sufficiently healthy or if standing merely replaces one type of sedentariness with another.
這讓另一項(xiàng)關(guān)于靜坐行為的新研究顯得格外重要。畢竟，對(duì)大多數(shù)人來(lái)說(shuō)，站立不是生理需求。有些科學(xué)家質(zhì)疑，只是站立——不動(dòng)，也不行走——是否足夠健康；站立是否只是另一種形式的久坐。
If so, standing could be expected to increase health problems and premature death, as sitting has been shown to do.
如果是這樣的話，站立可能會(huì)和靜坐一樣增加健康問(wèn)題，導(dǎo)致早逝。
To find out whether that situation held true, Peter Katzmarzyk, a professor of public health at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, La., and an expert on sedentary behavior, turned to a large database of self-reported information about physical activity among Canadian adults. He noted the amount of time that the men and women had reported standing on most days over the course of a decade or more and crosschecked that data with death records, to see whether people who stood more died younger.
為了弄清那種情況是否屬實(shí)，路易斯安那州巴吞魯日彭寧頓生物醫(yī)學(xué)研究中心的公共健康教授、靜坐行為研究專(zhuān)家彼得·卡茲馬茲克(Peter Katzmarzyk)開(kāi)始研究一個(gè)巨大的數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)，里面是加拿大成年人自我陳述的身體活動(dòng)信息。他記下那些人在十年或更長(zhǎng)時(shí)間內(nèi)大部分日子里站立的時(shí)間，與死亡檔案里的數(shù)據(jù)交叉檢查，看看那些站得更多的人是否死得更早。
The results, published in May in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, are soothing if predictable. Dr. Katzmarzyk found no link between standing and premature death. Rather, as he writes in the study, “mortality rates declined at higher levels of standing,” suggesting that standing is not sedentary or hazardous, a conclusion with which our telomeres would likely concur.
今年5月，他的研究結(jié)果在《運(yùn)動(dòng)鍛煉醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)》(Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise)上發(fā)表。結(jié)果不出意料，令人安慰�？ㄆ濕R茲克發(fā)現(xiàn)站立和早逝之間沒(méi)有關(guān)系。相反，他在研究報(bào)告中寫(xiě)道，“站立時(shí)間越長(zhǎng)，死亡率越低”，稱(chēng)站立不同于久坐，沒(méi)有危害——我們的端粒很可能會(huì)贊同這一結(jié)論。