Few institutions are more important to an urban community than its police, yet there are few subjects historians know so little about. Most of the early academic interests developed among political scientists and sociologists, who usually examined their own contemporary problems with only a nod toward the past. Even the public seemed concerned only during crime waves, periods of blatant corruption, or after a particularly grisly episode. Party regulars and reformers generally viewed the institution from a political perspective; newspapers and magazines - the nineteenth century's media - emphasized the vivid and spectacular.
Yet urban society has always vested a wide, indeed awesome, responsibility in its police. Not only were they to maintain order, prevent crime, and protect life and property, but historically they were also to fight fires, suppress vice, assist in health services, supervise elections, direct traffic, inspect buildings, and locate truants and runaways. In addition, it was assumed that the police were the special guardians of the citizens' liberties and the community's tranquillity. Of course, the performance never matched expectations. The record contains some success, but mostly failure; some effective leadership, but largely official incompetence and betrayal. The notion of a professional police force in America is a creation of the twentieth century; not until our own time have cities begun to take the steps necessary to produce modern departments.
對(duì)城市社區(qū)來(lái)說(shuō),很少有比它的警察更為重要的機(jī)構(gòu)了,但少有課題像歷史學(xué)家們對(duì)此了解得那樣少。 早期的學(xué)術(shù)興趣是在政治科學(xué)家和社會(huì)學(xué)家中發(fā)展起來(lái)的,他們一般只研究他們自己當(dāng)代的問(wèn)題而對(duì)過(guò)去的問(wèn)題只是偶爾帶過(guò)。 甚至公眾似乎也僅僅在犯罪浪潮、明目張膽的貪污或特別的恐怖事件發(fā)生時(shí)才關(guān)心。 政黨的忠誠(chéng)支持者和改革家們通常是從政治的前途來(lái)看待警察這個(gè)機(jī)構(gòu);而報(bào)紙和雜志-19世紀(jì)的傳播媒介-則著重活潑生動(dòng)和驚人的事件。 可是城市社會(huì)總是把廣泛得可怕的責(zé)任交給警察。 他們不僅維持秩序、防止犯罪、保護(hù)生命財(cái)產(chǎn),而且在過(guò)去還要救火、鎮(zhèn)壓罪惡、協(xié)助醫(yī)療服務(wù)、監(jiān)督選舉、指揮交通、檢查建筑物、尋找逃學(xué)學(xué)生和搜捕逃犯。 除此以外,警察還被認(rèn)為是公民自由和社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的特別保護(hù)者。 自然,警察的表現(xiàn)并不盡如人意。 他們的記錄中有成功者,但多數(shù)是失敗的;有高效率的領(lǐng)導(dǎo),但多半的人在職務(wù)上無(wú)能和不講信用。 專業(yè)警察部隊(duì)的概念在美國(guó)還是20世紀(jì)的產(chǎn)物;直到我們這個(gè)時(shí)代,一些城市才開始采取設(shè)立現(xiàn)代化部門的必要步驟。